Legal Commentary: SEC v. LBRY (2021–2023) — A Landmark for Crypto Regulation and Investor Protection

By Shahid Jamal Tubrazy, Crypto Lawyer & Blockchain Regulation Expert

The landmark case of SEC v. LBRY, Inc. (2021–2023) has reshaped how regulators and the courts view digital assets, token sales, and investor protections under U.S. law. For anyone involved in cryptocurrency — whether a project founder, investor, or scam victim — this case carries deep implications that continue to influence the legal landscape today.

The Case in Brief

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against LBRY, Inc., the developer of a blockchain-based content-sharing network. The SEC alleged that the company’s token, LBRY Credits (LBC), was sold to investors as an unregistered security — violating federal securities laws.

Despite LBRY’s argument that LBC was a utility token meant to support its platform’s ecosystem, the court sided with the SEC, ruling that LBRY Credits were indeed securities under the Howey Test. The judgment made clear that even tokens not sold through an ICO (Initial Coin Offering) can fall under SEC jurisdiction if marketed or perceived as an investment.

Key Legal Precedents and Lessons

Broadened SEC Authority Beyond ICOs This case reinforced that the SEC can regulate token sales even when there is no formal ICO. Any token distributed to raise funds, attract investors, or increase in value based on the efforts of a central team may qualify as a “security.”

Low Bar for Securities Classification The decision in SEC v. LBRY set a low threshold for what constitutes a securities offering. Even promotional statements suggesting token value appreciation were enough to establish investor expectation — triggering securities compliance obligations.

A Warning for All Token Issuers The case made clear that intent alone does not exempt a project. Even if a token has a genuine use case, if it is also positioned or interpreted as an investment opportunity, it can fall under SEC oversight.

Why This Matters for Crypto Victims

For crypto investors and scam victims, this case strengthens the legal foundation for regulatory protection and fund recovery. Tokens that were marketed deceptively, sold without registration, or used in misleading promotional schemes may now be more easily challenged under U.S. securities law.

Victims who lost funds to fraudulent exchanges, fake investment platforms, or deceptive token sales can leverage such precedents in their complaints, affidavits, or recovery claims — both in the U.S. and internationally.

As a crypto lawyer, I have seen countless investors who suffered due to the lack of transparency or unlawful conduct of token issuers and platforms. The LBRY case confirms that the law is evolving in favor of accountability and investor protection.

Legal Guidance and Support for Crypto Victims

If you have:

Lost funds in unregistered token sales or exchange scams;

Been promised unrealistic profits by a crypto platform or broker; or

Been misled by false marketing of “utility tokens” or investment opportunities —

then you may have a valid legal claim under securities law and fraud statutes.

I assist clients worldwide in:

Drafting formal complaints to regulators and law enforcement,

Preparing legal affidavits and recovery requests to exchanges,

Advising on securities compliance for blockchain projects, and

Representing victims in cross-border crypto dispute resolutions.

Conclusion

SEC v. LBRY is not just a case — it’s a signal. The courts have reaffirmed that transparency, compliance, and investor protection are central to the future of digital assets. For victims of crypto fraud or investors caught in unregulated markets, this decision opens new legal pathways for justice and recovery.

Disclaimer

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice.

Author & Crypto Consultant

Shahid Jamal Tubrazy (Crypto & Fintech Law Consultant)

Shahid Jamal Tubrazy, a certified top expert in Crypto Law from Duke University, is a leading authority in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space. As a seasoned Fintech lawyer, he offers a full spectrum of services, including licensing, legal guidance for ICOs, STOs, DeFi, and DAOs, as well as specialized expertise in crypto mediation, negotiation, and mergers and acquisitions. With a proven track record and published works on Blockchain Regulation and Cryptocurrency Laws, Shahid provides unparalleled insights into the complexities of the fintech world, ensuring compliance and strategic success. 🌐💼 #CryptoLaw #Fintech #Blockchain #LicenseServices #CryptoMediator #MergersAndAcquisitions #CryptoCompliance #FrozenAssetsrecovery.

EMAIL: shahidtubrazy@gmail.com

Website: https://cyberlawconsult.wixsite.com/cryptolawyer

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/fintechcryptolawyer

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tubrazyfintechlawyer/

Blogger: https://sjtubrazylegalpages.blogspot.com/