top of page

Payment Institution Licensing: Key Differences from EMI

Writer's picture: Tubrazy ShahidTubrazy Shahid

The rise of financial technology has ushered in new categories of licenses tailored to specific business models, with Payment Institution (PI) and Electronic Money Institution (EMI) licenses among the most common. These licenses are essential for fintech companies seeking to operate within regulated frameworks, particularly in the European Economic Area (EEA). While both serve the financial services ecosystem, their purposes, scope, and requirements differ significantly. Understanding these distinctions is vital for businesses looking to secure the appropriate license for their operations.

What is a Payment Institution License?

A Payment Institution (PI) license is primarily granted to companies offering payment services such as money transfers, payment processing, and remittance. Introduced under the Payment Services Directive (PSD2) in the European Union, the PI license enables businesses to execute payment transactions without holding customer funds beyond the execution phase.

Core Services Offered by Payment Institutions:

  1. Execution of payment transactions (e.g., credit transfers, direct debits, and card payments).

  2. Issuance of payment instruments such as prepaid cards.

  3. Money remittance services.

  4. Payment account-related services like withdrawals and deposits.

PI licenses cater to businesses that facilitate payments but do not need to create or manage e-money.

What is an EMI License?

An Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license, regulated under the E-Money Directive, is designed for companies issuing and managing electronic money—a digital equivalent of cash. Unlike PIs, EMIs can store customer funds indefinitely and provide accounts for holding e-money.

Core Services Offered by EMIs:

  1. Issuance and distribution of e-money.

  2. Execution of payment transactions with stored funds.

  3. Provision of payment accounts.

  4. Issuing debit cards linked to e-money accounts.

EMI licenses allow for broader operations compared to PIs, making them suitable for digital wallets, neobanks, and similar businesses.

Key Differences Between PI and EMI Licenses

Aspect

Payment Institution (PI)

Electronic Money Institution (EMI)

Core Function

Facilitating payment services.

Issuing and managing e-money.

Customer Funds

Cannot hold funds beyond the payment.

Can store funds indefinitely.

Services Offered

Payments, remittances, transfers.

Digital wallets, e-money accounts.

Capital Requirements

Lower initial capital requirement.

Higher due to fund storage obligations.

Business Models

Payment processors, gateways.

Neobanks, digital wallets.

Regulatory Oversight

PSD2 and local regulators.

E-Money Directive and local regulators.

Scope of Use

Narrower; does not handle e-money.

Broader; includes e-money services.

Choosing Between a PI and EMI License

Selecting the appropriate license depends on the business model and the nature of services offered:

  1. Choose a PI License if: You only intend to process payments or provide remittance services. You do not need to hold customer funds beyond the scope of payment execution.

  2. Choose an EMI License if: Your business involves issuing e-money or providing digital wallets. You plan to allow users to store funds for future use. You aim to build a neobank or similar financial platform.

Compliance Requirements for PI and EMI Licensing

Despite their differences, both licenses require compliance with stringent regulatory standards, including:

  1. Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC): Both PIs and EMIs must implement strong AML and KYC frameworks to prevent financial crimes.

  2. Capital Adequacy: PI licenses typically require an initial capital of €20,000 to €125,000 depending on the services. EMI licenses require a higher minimum capital, usually €350,000.

  3. Regulatory Reporting: Regular submission of operational reports to the relevant financial authorities.

  4. Governance Structure: Both require fit and proper management teams with relevant expertise.

Passporting Rights in the EU

Both PI and EMI licenses grant passporting rights, enabling businesses to operate across all EEA member states once licensed in one country. This advantage makes these licenses particularly attractive for fintech companies seeking to scale within Europe.

Conclusion

The choice between a Payment Institution and an Electronic Money Institution license depends on the specific services your fintech business aims to provide. While PIs are ideal for companies facilitating payments, EMIs offer a broader scope for those managing digital money storage and issuance. Understanding the key differences, compliance requirements, and business implications of each license ensures a smoother regulatory journey and positions your company for sustainable growth in the competitive fintech landscape.

If you're considering obtaining a PI or EMI license, consulting with legal experts specializing in fintech licensing can provide valuable guidance and ensure compliance with all regulatory obligations.

Disclaimer

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice.

Author & Crypto Consultant

Shahid Jamal Tubrazy (Crypto & Fintech Law Consultant)

Shahid Jamal Tubrazy, a certified top expert in Crypto Law from Duke University, is a leading authority in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space. As a seasoned Fintech lawyer, he offers a full spectrum of services, including licensing, legal guidance for ICOs, STOs, DeFi, and DAOs, as well as specialized expertise in crypto mediation, negotiation, and mergers and acquisitions. With a proven track record and published works on Blockchain Regulation and Cryptocurrency Laws, Shahid provides unparalleled insights into the complexities of the fintech world, ensuring compliance and strategic success. 🌐💼 #CryptoLaw #Fintech #Blockchain #LicenseServices #CryptoMediator #MergersAndAcquisitions #CryptoCompliance #FrozenAssetsrecovery.

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post

©2021 by https://cyberlawconsult.wixsite.com/cyberlawreport. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page